Customers should be legally responsible for ensuring that their security contractors are meeting SIA requirements
However security companies soon discovered a reluctance on the part of the majority of customers to pay any increase, even before the current recession started. Rather they hoped that the SIA would continue to promote the industry and encourage customers to meet the cost. Certainly the least that security companies should have been able to expect from the licensing authority was support in ensuring that their clients would at least have to ensure that contract companies they engage would be supplying licensed staff. A recent SIA press releaseshows that the SIA is not in fact supporting that position.
There appears to have been a total turnaround by the SIA on the culpability of the customers or clients. Last year, in response to a question raised at the SIA May 2009 conference, whether the SIA would be willing to investigate the possibility of a specific offence for clients knowingly using unlicensed persons, the SIA stated that criminal liability already existed under present legislation.
The spokesperson went on to say “When tackling security contractors providing unlicensed staff, one of our standard approaches is to engage with their customers and where necessary point out the customer’s liability for being a party to an offence of the supply of unlicensed operatives or operating without a licence. We have not yet found it necessary to prosecute a customer but it remains an option.”
The SIA statement following the outcome of the Sabrewatch prosecution declares “The retailers (who had no part in the offences as the staff were hired under contract) were supportive of the case and a number gave evidence against Sabrewatch in court.”
The Authority re-confirm this in the ‘Notes to editors’ stating “A customer hiring security staff under contract is not responsible for ensuring those staff are licensed – rather it is the duty of the contractor to ensure its staff are licensed before they are deployed.”
Was this a quid pro quo offered by the SIA to Sabrewatch clients to secure a prosecution that they might otherwise lose? The cynic in me envisages a deal whereby “we can offer you immunity from prosecution if you help us by giving evidence against the contractor”.
I have not yet seen sufficient details to understand why Sabrewatch was singled out for prosecution, but I feel that security companies’ customers would be taking more care in future when selecting a security company, if Sabrewatch’s customers or clients had also been prosecuted and presumably also found guilty. By focusing only on the contractor, I think this was a missed opportunity for the SIA to demonstrate its declared policy of enforcing the legislation fairly and proportionately against all those involved.
Customers always have the right to shop around for the best price, and to change supplier if they feel that a provider is supplying a poor service or is charging over the odds; this is the principal of open competition. However customers must be seen to be responsible under the law for ensuring that their contractors are meeting legislative requirements. Only then are we likely to see the remaining criminal elements expelled from the industry.
Latest articles on manned guarding and security guard services
Cut-Tex PRO cut resistant clothing achieves Level 5 rating on blade cut resistance tests
Security Industry Authority clamps down on rogue door staff working in London pubs and clubs
Synectics-based camera system reduces security incidents in the West Midlands
Bucks New University approval for Certificate in Pit Training course
The Security Industry Authority suspends 211 licences following alleged malpractice
OCS provides manned guarding and out of hours alarm response service to beCogent
G4S Cash Solutions secures contract for the provision of cash services to Silverstone Circuits
Kingdom Security selected as an IKEA preferred security supplier in the UK
IQinVision HD cameras help curb violence at football matches in Bratislava, Slovakia
...[view more articles on security guards and manned guarding]...
Other Security Guard Resources
Security guard exposed genitals at Queen's
A security guard has been found guilty of exposing his genitals to a woman at Queen's University Students' Union. Related Stories Tony Blair advised not to become a Catholic by Ian Paisley McGuinness 'would meet over Claudy' Maternity unit plans step closer Sex slavery: the Northern Ireland connection Pipe bomb prompts police warning
Security guard shoots lover
A security guard has been arrested for shooting dead his lover in Ivory Park, Ekurhuleni police say.
Security guard charged with murder of colleagues
KLANG: The security guard who allegedly shot two his colleagues dead at the Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital staff car park here on Aug 27 has been charged with murder.
Former security guard for pop-icon Britney Spears files charges of sexual harrassment against her
LOS ANGELES : A security guard that previously worked for pop-icon Britney Spears filed charges against her on Wednesday and the private security company that employed him for sexual harassment and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Security guard taken to hospital after car drives into window of Hallandale Beach bank
A security guard was taken to a hospital Tuesday morning after a car drove into a bank window.
Security guard charged for shooting colleagues dead
KLANG: The Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah security guard, who allegedly shot and killed his two colleagues last month, has been charged at the Magistrate court here this morning.
14. Security guard charged with murders of 2 colleagues
The security guard, who shot dead his two colleagues at the Tengku Ampuan Rahimah Hospital here, has been charged with their murders.
